@lastpirate1621

1 year ago

Some tried to weaken the hadith without an approved reason. Ibn al-Qayyim, may God have mercy on him, said: This made the judiciary difficult for many people, and the matter has been concluded from “Al-Ma’aad” (5/15). so for this matter there is something down and missing or maybe ... the reason for that is something else let me clirfiy it for you ignorances The hadith did not separate the story; He did not elaborate on the details of the accusation against this man, who was accusing him, and how the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, learned of that. But the definitive conclusion is that the order to kill him is not a limit to immorality. Because the punishment for adultery is not by striking the neck, but rather the reason for ordering the killing is to punish him for simply entering upon the mother of the son of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace; Since by entering upon the mother of his son, he brought the charge into the house of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, and his bed; It is a great harm that allows the blood of the abuser Sheikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may God have mercy on him, said: { This man commanded the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, to strike his neck, because he had made it lawful for his sanctity, and he did not order the implementation of the hadd punishment for adultery, because the hadd punishment for adultery is not the striking of the neck, rather if he was married he was stoned, and if he was not married he was flogged, and the punishment is not carried out on him except by four Martyrs or with valid recognition. When the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, ordered his head to be cut off, without elaborating whether he was married or not, he knew that he killed him because he had violated his sanctity. End quote from al-Sarim al-Maslool (2/122) Ibn al-Qayyim, may God have mercy on him, said: It is better than this to say: The Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, ordered Ali, may God be pleased with him, to kill him as a punishment, for his courage and daring to be alone with the mother of his son. Killing is not necessary, like the hadd punishment, rather it is dependent on the interest, revolving with it whether or not. End quote from Zaad al-Ma’aad (5/15). As for how did the Prophet, may God peace be upon him, know that he had entered? The news did not detail the incident, and did not mention what appeared to contradict the rules of Sharia, so there is no problem with the story. Because there are many reasonable bearings on which the behavior of the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, is based on; For example, if the entry of this person was proven by the testimony of his companions, may God be pleased with them, or the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, was briefed on his entry, and he forbade him, but he did not stop, and the likes of these are reasonable bearings Al-Mazari, may God Almighty have mercy on him, said: It seems that this hadith contains an omission and an explanation of the reason, so perhaps he, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, established with him evidence that necessitated his killing, so when Ali saw that it was obligatory, he kept it to refer to the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, about it, and he did not mention what Ali said to him, and if he mentioned the reason that necessitated his killing, And the answer of the Prophet, peace be upon him, to Ali, in order to learn from him the face of jurisprudence. Perhaps the man was also a hypocrite who it is lawful to kill, so this reason would be a motive for killing him. End quote from al-Muallim (3/342) Judge Ayyad, may God have mercy on him, said: God has exalted the sanctity of the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, to establish something of that in her direction, and the report is known that he was a Copt, and he used to talk to her by virtue of his nationality, so he spoke about that, and he did not come to believe that he became Muslim, and that the Prophet forbade him to speak to her, so when he contradicted him, he deserved that Killing, either for disobedience, or to harm the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him because of it, and whoever harms the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him with something: a cursed infidel deserves to be killed. End quote from Ikmal al-Moallem (8/304) Ibn Rajab, may God Almighty have mercy on him, said: Some of them held him to the point that the Copt was not yet a Muslim, and that if the Mu’ahid did something that harmed the Muslims, his covenant would be broken, so how about if he harmed the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him? And some of them said: Rather, he was a Muslim, but he forbade that and he did not stop, until people spoke because of him in the bed of the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, and the harm of the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, in his bed, permitted blood ... But when his innocence became apparent to the public, it became apparent to the people that Marie was innocent, so the reason for killing was no longer permitted. End quote from Jami’ al-‘Ulum wa’l-Hikum (312). And the precaution of the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, in dealing with this person is indicated by the fact that it was mentioned in a narration that he tied his neck to find him with her, with proof of his guilt. And There if you say ther is a problem with this wording, which is: How does he, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, order the beheading of this man, when there was no justification for killing, and this appeared when the man’s condition was revealed? And this problem disappears: that this hadith was narrated by Abu Bakr Al-Bazzar, with a more complete and clearer course than this, and he said in it: On the authority of Ali bin Abi Talib, may God be pleased with him, he said: (It was too much for Mariyah about a Coptic cousin of hers who used to visit her and disagree with her, so the Messenger told me God - may God’s prayers and peace be upon him -: Take this sword and go, and if you find it with it, kill it. He said: I said: O Messenger of God, I will be in your command like a red-hot rail, nothing will deter me, until I go as you commanded me, or does the witness see what the absent does not see? Rather, the witness sees what the absent does not see. This indicates that his command to kill him was on the condition that he finds him with her, in a state that requires killing him. And when Ali, may God be pleased with him, understood that, he asked him, and he explained to him a satisfactory statement, and that problem was removed.

7 |