Channel Avatar

Nekkid Watchmaker @UCSJ7LRO4GaHZdzowk2-7hJw@youtube.com

0 subscribers - no pronouns :c

Greetings and a warm welcome to you all. The mission of The


Nekkid Watchmaker
6 months ago - 1.1K likes

Hoping and praying the new year brings us ALL peace and justice. We are not free until all of us are free. If you are able to, please use your voices, however big or small. Have a word with whoever you can, your reps, your MPs, your leaders and call for an end to this madness, call for a ceasefire. This is not politics, this is tinkering level 10 to fix a broken world, to save it and restore it so that we can all enjoy it again, so that we can leave it for the future generations to enjoy it without fear. God bless you all. Free the watermelons 🍉

Nekkid Watchmaker
7 months ago - 486 likes

Whilst trying to restore a rare Heuer carrera with a derivative of a movement that claimed to be the first ever automatic chronograph, I came across this cool article which also has some canny parallels to what is happening in our world right now in the holy land. Whether it’s the industry of horology, war, media, politics and so on, the traits and qualities of a certain type of person(s) always seems to be present. A type of person who is willing to bend the truth, tell a mistruth or even an outright lie to convince others of its reputation and enigma, to convince others why they should revere a certain brand over a competitor. From what we have heard and seen regarding Palestine and Israel over the past few months, I sense that for a lot of people, the veil has somewhat been lifted. Respect has been lost, lies have been called out and our rosey image of certain institutions and certain people has forever changed.

This article is a good read and gives an insight in to the shenanigans that watch brands undertake in order for some reputational and economical gains. A trifling sum if you ask me. This article may also change your rosey view of your beloved watch brands and the watch industry.

————-
Rewriting history undermines the watch industry
With deference to the prosaic and self-congratulatory press releases that companies love to share with the watch world, Ken Kessler asks why brands can’t simply tell the truth.
By Ken Kessler
December 12, 2023

George Santayana warned that, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”.
Conversely, Henry Ford, that poster child of intolerance, spat out, “History is more or less bunk”.
Two opposing views but, for too many in the watch industry, alas, Ford is the one with whom they agree. For some watch houses, history is there for rewriting.

As cavalier with their own stories as they are with the English language, Swiss and not a few German wristwatch manufacturers play fast and loose with the facts.
Nobody wants consumers to be reminded that they made watches for Hitler to hand out to his officers.
The only deterrent to tampering with the past is that the internet places brand biographies at our fingertips, but even Wikipedia isn’t free of corrupting when the manufacturers write their own entries.
Almost without exception, brands are guilty of creating faux accounts of two particular aspects of their legacies. The first is exaggerating longevity, in particular uninterrupted production.
In some cases, the original brands never even made wristwatches yet they’re happy to suggest they’ve been at it for 250 years.
Doh: wristwatches didn’t even arrive until the 20th century.
Only slightly less egregious is the second area ripe for revisionism, as there is room for doubt.
It’s claiming to be responsible for horological firsts, whether milestone technical inventions or other achievements like attaining the greatest depth for diving watches.
Add to this a refusal to provide any disclosure or documentation when called to task by a journalist writing up a story, and you realise that Swiss watch houses take after their fellow countrymen in the banking industry. Silence or secrecy? The phrase “something to hide” springs to mind.
Says watch journalist Simon De Burton: “There are plenty of reasons why watch brands should never attempt to rewrite their histories – not least of which is that, in an age of instantly accessible facts which might have been impossible to unearth 20 years ago, the truth will always out.”
De Burton and other writers who do care about the facts are drawn to online watch enthusiasts and scholars who, he says, “appear to be on an almost evangelical mission to catch-out the fakers”.
With forensic approaches such as employed by the tenacious perezcope.com, which exists to expose revisionism and obscurantism, it has become increasingly more difficult to deceive journalists, retailers and ultimately consumers.
What’s so worrying in this era of fake news is that journalists who grew up after the arrival of online sources tend to believe press releases and brand-originated puffery.
They’re unaware of a time when one had to undertake actual research, when book stores weren’t bursting with brand histories and newsstands carried few watch magazines.
One might argue that they have no reason to be suspicious, but more experienced hacks know exactly how disingenuous brands can be.

Industry stalwart and chairman of Time Products Marcus Margulies sums up his thoughts on the relationship between brands and contemporary media, saying: “Brands are, for the most part, commercial entities that ignore their history and tell their clients what they hope will maximise sales. Each journalist is free to share their thoughts, which sadly are often a direct reflection of their relationship with certain brands and the advertising spend.”
Perhaps the least concerning of the claims for being first are the celebrated ‘perfect storms’ where three or more manufacturers came up with similar solutions within months of each other.
One on-going debate is who deserves the honour of creating the first automatic chronograph, a fracas dating back to 1969 involving Seiko, Zenith and a collaboration of Heuer, Buren, Breitling and Dubois-Depraz, all three contenders claiming the title.
The ambiguity is down to definitions: Are we discussing first produced? Modular vs integrated? First sold? First shown at a watch fair?
More recently emerging from the briny is a similar battle about credit for the first diving watch – not merely water-resistant but actually made for deep sea dives, as opposed to the less rigorous demands of scuba diving.
This three-way rivalry dates back to 1953 and involves Rolex’s Submariner, the Blancpain Fifty Fathoms and the Zodiac Sea Wolf.
Muddying the waters even further – again thanks to what criteria you wish to apply, e.g. does it have a rotating bezel? – are Panerai’s brutally rugged watches first seen in the late-1930s, and Omega’s double-cased Marine of 1932, neither of which sport said bezel.
But they were designed to go deep, so add them to the mix. All can claim the honour with some justification, and – being generous – the confusion might just be down to sloppy research.
Such examples aren’t so much about lying as they are pedantry.
In both of those debates, you could argue a case for each according to the definition. So heated is the battle to own the title of the world’s thinnest watch, a distinction which seems to change monthly, that the categories increase to spread the glory.
Thinnest repeater, thinnest chronograph, thinnest automatic, thinnest watch made on a Tuesday – take your pick.
There remains a litany of stories which keep watch enthusiasts fired up in bar disputes. The creation of assorted watch case designs and movement details have been declared by later users who categorically inherited them when they bought the companies which did devise them.
A perfect example is the design of the first successful automatic wristwatch, which belongs to British watchmaker John Harwood whatever anyone else might declare.
The worst abuse of this brands is often “disappear” independent designers, claiming in-house artistry.
But only an idiot would erase the involvement of a rock star designer like the late GĂŠrald Genta.
Another problematic area is the reviving of long-dormant brands – some out of action for centuries.
The definitive work, Kathleen H. Pritchard’s Swiss Timepiece Makers 1775-1975, lists over 8,500 entries, and that stops 50 years ago.
A phone call to a solicitor, some deep digging, and you, too, can own a forgotten name with horological roots in the 1700s. Bang! Instant provenance.
Peter Roberts, instrumental in the rebirth of famed British maker Dent, says: “We didn’t need to gild the lily. The history was genuine, it was admirable, and it was a name worth reviving without any fiction.”
The same is true for Duckworth Prestex, legitimately reborn as it was revived by a family descendant, as was Vertex.
Says Don Cochrane, “I grew up with stories about Vertex but it was my grandmother’s passing which served as a catalyst to bring it back to life. Our history is a genuine British-Swiss collaboration – we produced watches for the ‘Dirty Dozen’ during the Second World War – so we didn’t have to fabricate a thing.”
As De Burton says: “A watch brand should not have to rely on the past for its future.
History is important, but when the need arises to manipulate that history in an attempt to boost sales something must be wrong.”
Deserving of respect are the long-extant brands satisfied with their genuine histories. Omega’s NASA connection, Hamilton’s dominance of Hollywood when films need tool watches, Doxa producing the first orange-dialled diving watch for better legibility – there is no reason to spill porkies.
When brands are caught lying, the distrust this creates will never go away. De Burton sums it up perfectly.
“The key is to research diligently, stick only to the facts whether they are good or bad and, if there’s the slightest uncertainty, say nothing at all. Otherwise, a level of trust that might have been built-up over decades, even centuries, could be lost in a heartbeat.”
Or the tick of a timepiece.

Credit: watchpro December 2023

Nekkid Watchmaker
9 months ago - 1K likes

Greetings and salutations my dear friends

Many of you will be walking around with heavy hearts right about now. I too have been pondering how to use my small voice to provide some comfort to anyone that I can. We are all programmed to be partisan in nearly every aspect of our lives. wether it be sports or politics or even which brands we buy. Coke or Pepsi, apple or android. The power of partisanship is so strong and blind that some of us will support a football team that loses week in week out, causing us misery and pain, yet it is easier to get a divorce than it is to stop supporting that team. Some of us won’t touch Rolex with a barge pole and others will queue up for days for a plastic omega. It’s the same with politics, instead of us collectively interviewing the politicians from all parties to see who will do the best job for us, we just support one party because we have labelled ourselves as left wing or right wing without realising that both wings belong to the same bird. The most powerful tool in this day and age is not a Bergeon or horotec but the narrative. Whoever controls the narrative has the most powerful tool/weapon at their disposal. So it’s hard to find the real truth in these dreadful moments. But we can all agree that in this day and age we are always lied to. And there can only be one objective truth. Just look at the lies that we have been told over the past few years regarding a certain virus. Most of us believed these lies only to now realise we were duped. And this happens over and over again. There is good hidden inside everyone and people want to use their voices to try and do some good in the world but first we need the truth. So instead of us mere mortals trying to tell each other what the truth is, I advise you all to sincerely with an open heart ask the almighty to show you the truth and surely the truth will show itself and then you can decided if and how you should use your voice. In many political situations people will throw their voices around either for what they believe in, or some will jump on the bandwagon to virtue signal based on a trend that they think will benefit their appeal to others . Actors will act and idiots will be idiots based on the mask that suits their face, however the Middle East situation is where we really see peoples true faces as I have seen over the past few days. It is hard sometimes to accept or see the the truth because it may require us to go against our own tribe and that is human nature I guess. It may cost us socially and financially to do so and it will also sting if it doesn’t confirm our own biases. So whatever side of the electric fence you sit on I ask you to please put aside your biases and your partisanships and ask the creator with an open heart to guide you to the truth. I have been sitting here for days not being able to do anything. Usually I try and say something at the end of my videos but I can’t even concentrate on filming or working at the moment. All I can think about is using my platform to say something without alienating or dividing more people. I asked the almighty to allow me to do something good as most of us normal folk are always helpless to do anything in these situations as our actions and voices are usually drowned out. And it seems like a hollow platitude to ask for peace but that’s all I have in my limited vocabulary is to pray for peace.

P.s please please there is no need to engage with this post as it would suggest that some of us have the truth whilst others don’t. Let it be a private Q+A between you and the almighty. Ask him for the truth. He is the all knowing but If you want, tell him joe sent you.
The power of public opinion is probably the only thing that will stop this thing escalating in to WW3. So it’s important to know the truth before we influence that public opinion. Uphold the truth even if it means going against yourself and your tribe.

Peace and love to you all.

“Let my people go because they are us”

Nekkid Watchmaker
1 year ago - 862 likes

Thank you guys for all the feedback yesterday on the “nekkid acorn” watches. It was a mixed bag of comments and feedback but all of it was very constructive and respectful. So for now it looks like my little acorn is not going to grown in to an oak. It’s hard to design a watch from scratch and would probably add to the cost and be very time consuming. I’m pretty sure I would have to do some wind tunnel testing to see if it was aerodynamic enough while you’re walking about. Wouldn’t want it to drag you down and consume extra energy, thus causing you to stop every ten minutes for refuelling at the local coffee shop. I would probably have to do a crash test to see if it would survive a head on collision with a Rolex or a lamppost. But I hear you. I think homages may have to be a side dish alongside a nekkid unique design. Below are some famous companies who have also done the Royal Oak design just to give you an idea of the popularity of this iconic design hence why I thought it would be a safe design. Back to the pipe it is for some more dreaming. Peace and love to you all

Nekkid Watchmaker
1 year ago - 1.3K likes

Hello friends. Just testing the water with this post to see how many of you would be interested in some nekkid branded watches. Not trying to re-invent the wheel here. Many companies over the years such as bulova, Casio and others have used this same design and least you won’t have to say it’s a knockoff AP. It’s a nekkid oak, hehe. There will be an automatic with swiss eta 2824 and a quartz chronograph with Swiss Ronda. Both will be available in blue, black and green. If there is enough interest then I’ll make a private video explaining all the details. I’ll also open and strip these down to see the quality of work since they are made in china with Swiss parts.

Nekkid Watchmaker
1 year ago - 1.2K likes

So do you guys remember part 1 of the omega jedi video? Many of you noticed the box. Well as I finish off editing the full video, I keep hearing the cries from you guys telling me to restore the box. So shall I do it, shall I do it, shall I do it?

Nekkid Watchmaker
1 year ago - 541 likes

Sorry everyone who was in the middle of watching this video. YouTube put a copyright strike on a small sound/clip I had in the video so I’m uploading again

Nekkid Watchmaker
1 year ago - 545 likes

Another turd muffin trying to scam people using my logo. He is replying to your comments using my logo and pretending to be me, so please ignore and report. Stay vigilant my fellow vigilantes

Nekkid Watchmaker
1 year ago - 1.3K likes

Greetings, remember me? I was abducted by little aliens over the summer holiday but they’ve returned me back so I’ve done a video for my people. It’s a dive watch from the 1960s and should be uploaded tonight. Missed you guys. Peace ✌️

Nekkid Watchmaker
2 years ago - 1.1K likes

Hi everyone. There’s someone using my logo and replying to your comments with a scam offer about a giveaway so please be careful. It’s a scam. I have reported him to YouTube. What an absolute tool!!!